Skip to main content

Spiritual Abuse Questionnaire-Short Form


AI image Suttong.com 2025


Scale overview: The Spiritual Abuse Questionnaire-Short Form is a 4-item self-report instrument. Participants rate each item on a 4-point scale of agreement.

[Read more about Spiritual or Religious Abuse.]

Authors: Kaelyn R. Griffin and others – see reference below.

Response Type: A 4-point rating scale of agreement

1 = Strongly disagree

4 = Strongly agree


Scale items

The 4 items are found in the PsycTests reference and the journal article mentioned below.

The items address severe criticism, fear-based control, and inducing shame or helplessness.

See below for how to find the items.

Psychometric properties

Overall, the initial data support adequate reliability and validity in the US sample.

Means and SD are provided in Table 1 of the journal article. No problems were noted for skew or kurtosis.

The results include interitem correlations and findings from EFA, CFA, and measurement invariance testing.

Reliability data revealed good internal consistency with alpha = .85 and moderate test-retest of .52 over one week (N = 36).

Correlations with measures of depression and anxiety were low as was the relationship with the DUREL (r = -.27).

The short form was moderately correlated (r = .68) with the longer 17-item SAQ measure.

Availability

See Table 1 on page 6 of the journal article for the items. 

Contact person: Kraus, Shane W.: shane.kraus@unlv.edu
Kraus, Shane W., University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Department of Psychology 4505 Maryland Parkway Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89154, shane.kraus@unlv.edu

According to PsycTests, the scale may be used for research and teaching.

References for the scale

Griffin, Kaelyn R., Johnson, David A. L., Borgogna, Nicholas C., & Kraus, Shane W. (Feb 24, 2025). An examination and validation of a short form of the Spiritual Abuse
Questionnaire. Spirituality in Clinical Practice, np. doi:
https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/scp0000391

Griffin, K. R., Johnson, D. A. L., Borgogna, N. C., & Kraus, S. W. (2025). Spiritual Abuse
Questionnaire--Short Form [Database record]. Retrieved from APA PsycTests. doi:
https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/t94773-000


Reference for using scales in research:

Buy Creating Surveys on

GOOGLE BOOKS

 

AMAZON

 


 

 

 





Reference for clinicians on understanding assessment

Buy Applied Statistics for Counselors

 

GOOGLE BOOKS

 

AMAZON

 


 

 





Resource Links:
 

All Measures A – Z Test Index

Spirituality Measures A - Z

Statistical Concepts A - Z

Spiritual Abuse Questionnaire 17 item

Religious or Spiritual Abuse

Spiritual and Religious Harassment

Spiritual or Religious Neglect



NOTICE:

The information about scales and measures is provided for clinicians and researchers based on professional publications. The links to authors, materials, and references can change. You may be able to locate details by contacting the main author of the original article or another author on the article list.


Post Author

Geoffrey W. Sutton, Professor Emeritus of Psychology at Evangel University, holds a master’s degree in counseling and a PhD in psychology from the University of Missouri-Columbia. His postdoctoral work encompassed education and supervision in forensic and neuropsychology. As a licensed psychologist, he conducted clinical and neuropsychological evaluations and provided psychotherapy for patients in various settings, including schools, hospitals, and private offices. During his tenure as a professor, Dr. Sutton taught courses on psychotherapy, assessment, and research. He has authored over one hundred publications, including books, book chapters, and articles in peer-reviewed psychology journals. His website is https://suttong.com You can find Dr. Sutton's books on   AMAZON    and  GOOGLE. Many publications are free to download at ResearchGate   and Academia  

 











Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Personal Self-Concept Questionnaire (PSQ)

  The Personal Self-Concept Questionnaire  ( PSQ )   Overview The Personal Self-Concept Questionnaire (PSQ) measures self-concept based on ratings of 18 items, which are grouped into four categories: Self-fulfilment, autonomy, honesty, and emotional self-concept. It is a likert-type rating scale with high internal consistency values and has been used with youth and adults. Subscales : The PSQ has four subscales 1. Self-fulfilment (6 items) 2. Autonomy (4 items) 3. Honesty (3 items) 4. Emotional self-concept (5 items)  ðŸ‘‰ [ Read more about Self-Concept and Self-Identity] The PSQ is a Likert-type scale with five response options ranging from totally disagree to totally agree. Reliability and Validity In the first study, coefficient alpha = .85 and in study two, alpha = .83. Data analysis supported a four-dimensional model (see the four categories above). Positive correlations with other self-concept measures were statistically significant. Other notes The authors e...

Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ)

  Scale name: Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ) Scale overview: The Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ) is a 29-item self-report measure of both mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics anxiety. Author: Diana Kathleen May Response Type: Items are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale following a “no response” option: 1 = Never 2 = Seldom 3 = Sometimes 4 = Often 5 = usually Sample items 1. I feel confident enough to ask questions  in my mathematics class. 6. I worry that I will not be able to get a  good grade in my mathematics course.   Subscales and basic statistics for the MSEAQ       Self-Efficacy M = 44.11, SD = 10.78, alpha = .93       Anxiety M = 46.47, SD = 12.61, alpha = .93       Total Scale M = 90.58, SD = 22.78, alpha = .96 Reliability: See the Cronbach’s alpha levels reported above. Validity: There were significant ...

Academic Self-Efficacy Scale ASE

  Overview The  Academic Self-Efficacy Scale is an application of Self-Efficacy Theory   to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and academic performance using 8-items rated on a 7-point scale. The work of Chemers et al. (2001) has been widely cited. Format The 8-items are rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 = Very Untrue to 7 = Very True. Sample Items 2. I know how to take notes. 6. I usually do very well in school and at academic tasks.   Reliability, Validity, and Other Research notes In the article describing the development and use of the ASE, the authors observed: “As predicted, academic self-efficacy was significantly and directly related to academic expectations and academic performance.” (Chemers et al., 2001, p. 61)   Sutton et al. (2011) reported Cronbach's alpha of .83 in their study of academic self-esteem and personal strengths. ASE was highly positively correlated with ACT scores (.24) and GPA (.39)....