Assessment, Statistics, and Research

Assessment name: Alternative Workplace Bullying Scale  Scale overview:  This 21-item Alternative Workplace Bullying Scale (AWBPS) measures work-related and person-related bullying. It shows promise based on the item content and psychometric properties (Sutton, 2025, November 21). Cite this Post Sutton, G. W. (Sutton, 2025, November 21). Alternative Workplace Bullying Scale.  Assessment, Statistics, and Research.  https://statistics.suttong.com/2025/11/alternative-workplace-bullying-scale.html Read more about bullying in the workplace. Authors:  Ambreen Anjum, Amina Muazzam, Farkhanda Manzoor, Anna Visvizi, Gary Pollock, and Raheel Nawaz Response Type:  Five-point frequency of occurrence rating scale:  1 = Never  2 = Rarely  3 = Monthly  4 = Weekly  5 = Daily Scale items (Examples) Translated into English   Undervaluing your work   Verbal and non-verbal threats   Neglect of your opinions or views Psychometric propertie...

Measuring Bullying in the Workplace Assessment name: Short Negative Acts Questionnaire (SNAQ) Scale overview: The Short Negative Acts Questionnaire (SNAQ) is a 9-item self-report rating scale derived from the 22-item Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R) to assess bullying in the workplace (Notelaers et al., 2018). The SNAQ contains items for each of the three types of bullying (person-oriented, work-related, and social exclusion), which are rated on a 4-point frequency scale: never, occasionally, monthly, weekly or more often (Sutton, 2025, November 19). Cite this post: Sutton, G. W. (2025, November 19). Short Negative Acts Questionnaire (SNAQ): Measuring bullying at work. Assessment, Statistics, and Research. https://statistics.suttong.com/2025/11/short-negative-acts-questionnaire-snaq.html Read more about bullying:   Bullying: Understanding the Psychology of Harm Authors: Guy Notelaers, Beatrice Van der Heijden, Helge Hoel &Ståle Einarsen Response Type: The SNAQ ...

AI image Suttong.com 2025 Scale overview: The Spiritual Abuse Questionnaire-Short Form is a 4-item self-report instrument developed by Griffin and her colleagues (2025). Participants rate each item on a 4-point scale of agreement.  The SAQ‑SF is a short, psychometrically sound measure for identifying potential experiences of spiritual abuse. It shows strong internal consistency, moderate short‑term stability, and distinctiveness from general mental health or religiosity measures (Sutton, 2025, July 27). Cite Post Sutton, G. W. (2025, July 27). Spiritual Abuse Questionnaire-Short Form by Griffin et al. Assessment, Statistics, and Research. 2025.  https://statistics.suttong.com/2025/07/spiritual-abuse-questionnaire-short-form.html [ Read more about Spiritual or Religious Abuse.] Sponsor. Reference for using scales in research: Buy Creating Surveys on GOOGLE BOOKS   AMAZON         ___________________ Authors : Kaelyn R. Griffin and others (2025) – ...

  Assessment name:   Divine Spiritual Struggles Scale Scale overview: The Divine Spiritual Struggles Scale measures the degree of distress experienced by adolescents in their relationship with God or a higher power. Scale data were obtained from a sample of adolescents who reported sexual abuse.   Authors: Ernest Jouriles and others (2020).  See scale reference below.     Response Type: Four items are rated on a 4-point scale of frequency related to feeling “punished, abandoned, and questioned God’s love” when they thought about sexual abuse in the preceding month.  0 = not at all  1 = somewhat  2 = quite a bit  3 = a great deal Scale items The four items in the scale can be found in the PsycTESTS reference below. Psychometric properties The scale was used in two studies (see Jouriles et al., 2020) with a combined n of 347 adolescents who had a mean age of 13.53 and 13.71, respectively. More than 90% were...

  Scale name: Spiritual Abuse Questionnaire (SAQ) Scale overview: The  Spiritual Abuse Questionnaire (SAQ)  is a 17-item self-report questionnaire that uses a 4-point Likert Type response format to measure two dimensions of abuse: Power-based affective wounding and Conditionality. Author: Kathryn Hope Keller   Response Type: 4-point Likert type. The choices are: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Agree, Strongly agree. Subscales and Sample Items: There are two subscales. 1. Power-based Affective Wounding : “At times, I was scolded by my leader and made to feel ashamed and helpless” and “I now feel cynical about church/religious groups.”   2. Conditionality: “I believed I could be totally surrendered to God if I did everything perfectly according to the church/group’s instructions,” and “I believed God would punish me if I didn’t do what my church/group encouraged me to do.” Reliability: Alpha for the 17-item scale was .95 (Keller, 2016). ...