![]() |
| Enneagram Infographic / Geoffrey W. Sutton, PhD |
Scale name: Enneagram [Riso-Hudson Enneagram Type Indicator [RHETI®]
Scale
overview: There is
more than one version of the Enneagram, which purports to measure how an
individual’s personality fits with nine types. The version referred to in this
post is the RHETI®—see above for the full name.
A study by
Newgent et al. (2004) used the 144-item forced choice format.
Authors:
Don Richard Riso and Russ Hudson
Response
Type: Forced-choice
format
Subscales:
Nine Enneagram types and descriptors
1 Reformer- principled, idealistic: purposeful, self-controlled, perfectionistic
2 Helper- caring, interpersonal type: people pleasing, generous, possessive
3 Achiever- success-oriented type: image-conscious, adaptive, driven
4. Individualist- sensitive, introspective type: expressive, dramatic, temperamental
5 Investigator- intense, cerebral type: perceptive, innovative, isolated
6 Loyalist- committed, security-oriented type: engaging, anxious, responsible
7 Enthusiast- busy, fun-loving type: spontaneous, distractible, scattered
8 Challenger- powerful, dominating type: decisive, willful, confrontational, self-confident
9 Peacemaker- easy-going, self-effacing type: agreeable, complacent, receptive
More detailed descriptions can be found at The Enneagram Institute
Sample
item: (Newgent, et
al., 2004, p. 228)
Item I contains the following two
responses: "I've been romantic and imaginative" and "I’ve been
pragmatic and down to earth." The first response is associated with the
Individualist and the second response is associated with the Loyalist
Reliability: In their small study, Newgent et
al. (2004) reported a range of alpha values from .56 (Achiever, Investigator) to
.82 (Helper) six scales were at or above alpha .70.
Validity: Newgent et al. (2004) administered a
version of the Big Five (NEO PI-R). They calculated correlations and performed
a canonical variate analysis. They reported that all of the RHETI types were
significantly correlated with at least one of the five NEO PI-R factors. See
Table 1 for the details.
Notes
Hook et al.
(2021) published a review of the literature on the Enneagram. They found mixed
evidence regarding reliability and validity. Factor analyses yielded less
than nine factors.
Several
have found the Enneagram useful in spiritual growth. For example, see (Kam, 2018;
Singletary, 2020).
In the SCOPES model, the Enneagram fits in the O = Observable behavior pattern of functioning.
Enneagram Availability
Link to the
Riso-Hudson Enneagram Type
Indicator version 2.5
The fee was
$12 on the date of this blogpost
A shorter,
36-item version is free online as of the date of this blogpost
Link to Open Enneagram of Personality
Scales
Related Posts
SCOPES model of human functioning
References
Hook, J.
N., Hall, T. W., Davis, D. E., Van Tongeren, D. R., & Conner, M. (2021).
The Enneagram: A systematic review of the literature and directions for future
research. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 865–883. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23097
Kam, C.
(2018). Integrating divine attachment theory and the Enneagram to help clients
of abuse heal in their images of self, others, and God. Pastoral Psychology,
67(4), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-018-0817-1
Newgent, R.
A., Parr, P. E., Newman, I., & Higgins, K.K. (2004) The Riso-Hudson
Enneagram Type Indicator: Estimates of reliability and validity. Measurement
and evaluation in counseling and development, 36, 226-237.
Singletary,
J. (2020). Head, heart, and hand: Understanding Enneagram centers for
leadership development. Social Work & Christianity, 47(4), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.34043/swc.v47i3.126
Reference for using scales in research:
Buy Creating Surveys on
Reference for clinicians on understanding assessment
Buy Applied Statistics for
Counselors
Test Resource Link: A – Z Test Index
Post Author

Comments
Post a Comment