Skip to main content

Faith at Work Scale (FWS)

 


Assessment name:  Faith at Work Scale (FWS)

Scale overview: The Faith at Work Scale is a 15-item, single-factor, self-report assessment of five dimensions of faith at work.

Authors: Monty Lynn, Michael Naughton, Steve VanderVeen

Response Type: A five-point rating scale

  5 = Always or frequently

  4 = Often

  3 = Sometimes

  2 = Seldom

  1 = Never or infrequently

Scale items

There are 15 items

Although there is one factor, the authors identify 5 dimensions: Relationship, Meaning, Community, Holiness, Giving.

Sample items:

  I sense God’s presence while at work.

  I pursue excellence at work because of my faith.

Population sampled:

  Alumni of business programs from four US religious higher education institutions. 

  They were stratified by graduation decade between 1958 and 2005

  Contact by email 272 of 1284 email responses- active religious workers = 234

Psychometric properties

Data analyses supported one factor.

   Eigenvalue = 8.88, variance accounted for = 59.22%

  Cronbach’s alpha value = 0.77

Validity notes

 Positive correlation with the Faith Maturity Scale: r = .81

Means and SDs provided for 4 groups of Christian traditions.

Availability:

The items can be found in Lynn et al. (2009).

See Table V for items associated with the 5 dimensions.

Contact for lead author on the article:

Monty. L. Lynn Management Sciences, Abilene Christian University, ACU Box 29325, Abilene, TX 79699, U.S.A. E-mail: lynnm@acu.edu



Resource Links:


  A – Z Test Index

  A - Z Index of Spiritual & Religious Assessment 

References for the scale

Lynn, M.L., Naughton, M.J. & VanderVeen, S. Faith at Work Scale (FWS): Justification, development, and validation of a measure of Judaeo-Christian religion in the workplace. (2009). Journal of Busness Ethics, 85, 227–243. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10551-008-9767-3

Sutton, G. W. (2024, January 25). Faith at Work Scale. Assessment, Statistics, and Research. Retrieved from https://statistics.suttong.com/2024/01/faith-at-work-scale-fws.html


Reference for using scales in research:

Assessing Spirituality & Religiosity

Available on AMAZON

 


Buy Creating Surveys on

GOOGLE BOOKS

 

AMAZON

 


 

  

Reference for clinicians on understanding assessment

Buy Applied Statistics for Counselors

 

GOOGLE BOOKS

 

AMAZON

 


  

Resource Links:


  A – Z Test Index

  A - Z Index of Spiritual & Religious Assessment 

NOTICE:

The information about scales and measures is provided for clinicians and researchers based on professional publications. The links to authors, materials, and references can change. You may be able to locate details by contacting the main author of the original article or another author on the article list.

 

Post Author

 

Geoffrey W. Sutton PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology who publishes book and articles about clinical and social psychology including the psychology of religion. Website:     www.suttong.com

  

Books available on   AMAZON       and the   GOOGLE STORE

 

Connections

   FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton  

  

   X  @Geoff.W.Sutton

 

   PINTEREST  www.pinterest.com/GeoffWSutton

 

Read many published articles and book samples on:

 

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton   

 

  ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Academic Self-Efficacy Scale ASE

  Overview The  Academic Self-Efficacy Scale is an application of Self-Efficacy Theory   to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and academic performance using 8-items rated on a 7-point scale. The work of Chemers et al. (2001) has been widely cited. Format The 8-items are rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 = Very Untrue to 7 = Very True. Sample Items 2. I know how to take notes. 6. I usually do very well in school and at academic tasks.   Reliability, Validity, and Other Research notes In the article describing the development and use of the ASE, the authors observed: “As predicted, academic self-efficacy was significantly and directly related to academic expectations and academic performance.” (Chemers et al., 2001, p. 61)   Sutton et al. (2011) reported Cronbach's alpha of .83 in their study of academic self-esteem and personal strengths. ASE was highly positively correlated with ACT scores (.24) and GPA (.39)....

Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS)

  Assessment name:   Brief Self-Control Scale Scale overview: The Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS) is a 13-item self-report measure of self-control, which is also called self-discipline and willpower.   Authors: June P. Tangney, Roy F. Baumeister, Angie L. Boone   Response Type: Items are rated on a five-point scale of self-evaluation from 1 = not at all like me to 5 = very much like me. Scale items Example items include “I am good at resisting temptation” and “I have a hard time breaking bad habits” (reverse coded). Psychometric properties In their original publication, Tangney and others (2004) documented high internal consistency and retest values. High scores representing self-control were associated with academic success and better relationships whereas low scores were correlated with personal problems and problem relationships. Availability: The BSCS is widely used and available in many languages. The original 36-item scale and the Brief...

Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ)

  Scale name: Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ) Scale overview: The Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ) is a 29-item self-report measure of both mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics anxiety. Author: Diana Kathleen May Response Type: Items are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale following a “no response” option: 1 = Never 2 = Seldom 3 = Sometimes 4 = Often 5 = usually Sample items 1. I feel confident enough to ask questions  in my mathematics class. 6. I worry that I will not be able to get a  good grade in my mathematics course.   Subscales and basic statistics for the MSEAQ       Self-Efficacy M = 44.11, SD = 10.78, alpha = .93       Anxiety M = 46.47, SD = 12.61, alpha = .93       Total Scale M = 90.58, SD = 22.78, alpha = .96 Reliability: See the Cronbach’s alpha levels reported above. Validity: There were significant ...