Skip to main content

Rotter’s Locus of Control Scale

 

Considering Locus of Control 2024

Assessment name: Rotter’s Locus of Control Scale

Scale overview: Rotter’s Locus of Control Scale is a 29-item measure of beliefs about external or internal sources of influence on one’s life.

The scale is also referred to as LCS.

Author: Julian Rotter

Response Type: Forced choice between two items.

Scale items: See the items at the bottom of this post.

Psychometric properties:

A review of internal consistency values from several studies revealed a mean of .663 and test-retest mean of .663 (Huizing, 2015).

Klockars, A. J., & Varnum, S. W. (1975) found six factors suggesting the scale measures multiple dimensions.

Lange and Tiggermann (2010) reported test-retest reliability of .61 in their sample.

 

Comment:

Some researchers have questioned the structure of the original scale in terms of its ability to clearly measure either internal or external locus of control. Additional measures have been developed including a measure specifically for religious people (Gabbard et al., 1986). The difficulties suggest caution when using the original scale; however, it is useful to consider Rotter’s ideas reflected in the scale when evaluating newer scales, evaluating research based on the original scale, and citing the history of development of various measures of the locus of control concept.

Read more about the concept Locus of Control.

 

Availability:

A web source pdf (also see items below): https://positivepsychology.com/locus-of-control-test/#questionnaires

 

 

References for the scale

Gabbard, Clinton E., Howard, George S., & Tageson, C. William. (1986). Assessing locus of control with religious populations. Journal of Research in Personality, Vol 20(3), 292-308. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(86)90136-4,

Huizing (2015). Who’s controlling locus of control? cross-cultural LOC usage. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 9, 76-88.

Klockars, A. J., & Varnum, S. W. (1975). A test of the dimensionality assumptions of Rotter's Internal-External scale. Journal of personality assessment, 39(4), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa3904_13

Lange, R. V., & Tiggemann, M. (1981). Dimensionality and Reliability of the Rotter I-E Locus of Control Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment45(4), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4504_9

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.

 

Reference for using scales in research:

Buy Creating Surveys on

GOOGLE BOOKS

 

AMAZON

 


 

 

 

Reference for clinicians on understanding assessment






Buy Applied Statistics for Counselors

 

GOOGLE BOOKS

 

AMAZON

 








 

 

 

Resource Link:  A – Z Test Index

 

 

 

NOTICE:

The information about scales and measures is provided for clinicians and researchers based on professional publications. The links to authors, materials, and references can change. You may be able to locate details by contacting the main author of the original article or another author on the article list.

 

Post Author

 

Geoffrey W. Sutton PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology who publishes book and articles about clinical and social psychology including the psychology of religion. Website:     www.suttong.com

  

Books available on   AMAZON       and the   GOOGLE STORE

 

Connections

   FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton  

  

   TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton

 

   PINTEREST  www.pinterest.com/GeoffWSutton

 

Read many published articles and book samples on:

 

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton   

 

  ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

 

 

Rotter's Locus of Control Scale 

 

For each question select the statement that you agree with the most

 

1.  a. Children get into trouble because their patents punish them too much. 

    b. The trouble with most children nowadays is that their parents are too easy with them. 

2. a. Many of the unhappy things in people's lives are partly due to bad luck. 

    b. People's misfortunes result from the mistakes they make. 

3. a. One of the major reasons why we have wars is because people don't take enough interest in politics. 

    b. There will always be wars, no matter how hard people try to prevent them. 

4. a. In the long run people get the respect they deserve in this world 

    b. Unfortunately, an individual's worth often passes unrecognized no matter how hard he tries 

5. a. The idea that teachers are unfair to students is nonsense. 

    b. Most students don't realize the extent to which their grades are influenced by accidental happenings. 

6. a. Without the right breaks one cannot be an effective leader. 

    b. Capable people who fail to become leaders hive not taken advantage of their opportunities. 

7. a. No matter how hard you try some people just don't like you. 

   b. People who can't get others to like them don't understand how to get along with others. 

8. a. Heredity plays the major role in determining one's personality 

    b. It is one's experiences in life which determine what they're like. 

9. a. I have often found that what is going to happen will happen. 

    b. Trusting to fate has never turned out as well for me as making a decision to take a definite course of action. 

a. In the case of the well prepared student there is rarely if ever such a thing as an unfair test. 

Many times exam questions tend to be so unrelated to course work that studying in really useless. 

a. Becoming a success is a matter of hard work, luck has little or nothing to do with it. 

Getting a good job depends mainly on being in the right place at the right time. 

a. The average citizen can have an influence in government decisions. 

This world is run by the few people in power, and there is not much the little guy can do about it. 

a. When I make plans, I am almost certain that I can make them work. 

It is not always wise to plan too far ahead because many things turn out to- be a matter of good or bad fortune anyhow. 

a. There are certain people who are just no good. 

There is some good in everybody. 

a. In my case getting what I want has little or nothing to do with luck. 

Many times we might just as well decide what to do by flipping a coin. 

a. Who gets to be the boss often depends on who was lucky enough to be in the right place first. 

Getting people to do the right thing depends upon ability. Luck has little or nothing to do with it. 

a. As far as world affairs are concerned, most of us are the victims of forces we can neither understand, nor control. 

By taking an active part in political and social affairs the people can control world events. 

a. Most people don't realize the extent to which their lives are controlled by accidental happenings. 

There really is no such thing as "luck." 

a. One should always be willing to admit mistakes. 

It is usually best to cover up one's mistakes. 

a. It is hard to know whether or not a person really likes you. 

How many friends you have depends upon how nice a person you are. 

a. In the long run the bad things that happen to us are balanced by the good ones. 

Most misfortunes are the result of lack of ability, ignorance, laziness, or all three. 

a. With enough effort we can wipe out political corruption. 

It is difficult for people to have much control over the things politicians do in office. 

a. Sometimes I can't understand how teachers arrive at the grades they give. 

There is a direct connection between how hard 1 study and the grades I get. 

a. A good leader expects people to decide for themselves what they should do. 

A good leader makes it clear to everybody what their jobs are. 

a. Many times I feel that I have little influence over the things that happen to me. 

It is impossible for me to believe that chance or luck plays an important role in my life. 

a. People are lonely because they don't try to be friendly. 

There's not much use in trying too hard to please people, if they like you, they like you. 

a. There is too much emphasis on athletics in high school. 

Team sports are an excellent way to build character. 

a. What happens to me is my own doing. 

Sometimes I feel that I don't have enough control over the direction my life is taking. 

a. Most of the time I can't understand why politicians behave the way they do. 

In the long run the people are responsible for bad government on a national as well as on a local level. 

 

 

Score one point for each of the following: 

2. a, 3.b, 4.b, 5.b, 6.a, 7.a, 9.a, 10.b, 11.b, 12.b, 13.b, 15.b, 16.a, 17.a, 18.a, 20.a, 

21. a, 22.b, 23.a, 25.a, 26.b, 28.b, 29.a. 

A high score = External Locus of Control 

A low score = Internal Locus of Control 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Personal Self-Concept Questionnaire (PSQ)

  The Personal Self-Concept Questionnaire  ( PSQ )   Overview The Personal Self-Concept Questionnaire (PSQ) measures self-concept based on ratings of 18 items, which are grouped into four categories: Self-fulfilment, autonomy, honesty, and emotional self-concept. Subscales : The PSQ has four subscales 1. Self-fulfilment (6 items) 2. Autonomy (4 items) 3. Honesty (3 items) 4. Emotional self-concept (5 items)  ðŸ‘‰ [ Read more about Self-Concept and Self-Identity] The PSQ is a Likert-type scale with five response options ranging from totally disagree to totally agree. Reliability and Validity In the first study, coefficient alpha = .85 and in study two, alpha = .83. Data analysis supported a four-dimensional model (see the four categories above). Positive correlations with other self-concept measures were statistically significant. Other notes The authors estimated it took about 10 minutes to complete the PSQ. Their first study included people ages 12 to 36 ( n = 506). In the second s

Student Self-Efficacy

  Assessment name:  STUDENT SELF-EFFICACY SCALE * Note. This post has been updated to provide an available measure of student self-efficacy. ———- Scale overview:  The  student self-efficacy scale i s a 10-item measure of self-efficacy. It was developed using data from university nursing students in the United States. Authors: Melodie Rowbotham and Gerdamarie Schmitz Response Type:  A four-choice rating scale as follows: 1 = not at all true 2 = hardly true 3 = moderately true 4 = exactly true   Self-efficacy is the perception that a person can act in a way to achieve a desired goal.  Scale items There are 10 items. Examples: I am confident in my ability to learn, even if I am having a bad day. If I try hard enough, I can obtain the academic goals I desire.   Psychometric properties The authors reported that their sample scores ranged from 25 to 40 with a scale mean of 34.23 ( SD  = 3.80. Internal consistency was high at alpha = .84. The authors reported the results of a principal compon

Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ)

  Scale name: Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ) Scale overview: The Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ) is a 29-item self-report measure of both mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics anxiety. Author: Diana Kathleen May Response Type: Items are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale following a “no response” option: 1 = Never 2 = Seldom 3 = Sometimes 4 = Often 5 = usually Sample items 1. I feel confident enough to ask questions  in my mathematics class. 6. I worry that I will not be able to get a  good grade in my mathematics course.   Subscales and basic statistics for the MSEAQ       Self-Efficacy M = 44.11, SD = 10.78, alpha = .93       Anxiety M = 46.47, SD = 12.61, alpha = .93       Total Scale M = 90.58, SD = 22.78, alpha = .96 Reliability: See the Cronbach’s alpha levels reported above. Validity: There were significant positive correlations with similar measures. The results of a Fa