Skip to main content

Christian-Based Grief Recovery Scale (CGRS)




 Six Dimensions of Recovery

Assessment name: Christian-Based Grief Recovery Scale (CGRS)

Scale overview: The Christian-Based Grief Recovery Scale (CGRS) is a measure of Christian spirituality focused on recovery from grief. The measures includes 35-items to assess six factors.

Authors: Peter Jen Der Pan et al., 2014

Response Type: Four point rating scale

Scale items: The items are organized into six factors or subscales. The subscales and sample items are below.

1. Spiritual well-being

  With God by my side, I will feel safe and peaceful.

2.  Recovering meaning and sense of control

  After experiencing the sorrow, I have realized what the most important things in life are.

3.  Ongoing physical and emotional responses

I think it’s unfair that my loved one has passed away while I still have to struggle to survive.

4. Reassuring faith

Even though my loved one is no longer alive, I believe that God is always around me and helps me.

5. Strongly missing a deceased loved one

I still miss very much my loved one who has passed away.

6. Life disturbance

I still have unconscious chills when I think of the incident.

 

Psychometric properties

The authors reported alpha = .94 for the total score. The subscale alphas range from .74 to .88.

The six factors accounted for 63.27% of the variance.

The CGRS was positively associated with another measure — Inventory of Grief.

Availability: The items can be found in Table 1 of the Pan et al. (2014) article.

Author contact listed on the article: jender@cycu.edu.tw


Read more about the Psychology of Grief 


Reference for the scale

Jen Der Pan, P., Deng, L.-Y. F., Tsai, S. L., Chen, H.-Y. J., & Yuan, S.-S. J. (2014). Christian-based Grief Recovery Scale (CGRS) [Database record]. APA PsycTests.

https://doi.org/10.1037/t44762-000

 

Sutton, G. W. (2024, April 23). Christian-based Grief Recovery Scale summary. Assessment, Statistics, and Research. Retrieved from

 

Reference for hundreds of measures of spirituality

Assessing Spirituality & Religiosity


ON AMAZON


Reference for using scales in research:

Buy Creating Surveys on

GOOGLE BOOKS

 

AMAZON

 

 

 Reference for clinicians on understanding assessment

Buy Applied Statistics for Counselors

 

GOOGLE BOOKS

 

AMAZON

 


 

 

 




Resource Link:  A – Z Test Index

 

 

 

NOTICE:

The information about scales and measures is provided for clinicians and researchers based on professional publications. The links to authors, materials, and references can change. You may be able to locate details by contacting the main author of the original article or another author on the article list.

 

Post Author

 

Geoffrey W. Sutton PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology who publishes book and articles about clinical and social psychology including the psychology of religion. Website:     www.suttong.com

  

Books available on   AMAZON       and the   GOOGLE STORE

 

Connections

   FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton  

  

   X  @Geoff.W.Sutton

 

   PINTEREST  www.pinterest.com/GeoffWSutton

 

FREE: Read many published articles and book samples on:

 

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton   

 

  ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Academic Self-Efficacy Scale ASE

  Overview The  Academic Self-Efficacy Scale is an application of Self-Efficacy Theory   to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and academic performance using 8-items rated on a 7-point scale. The work of Chemers et al. (2001) has been widely cited. Format The 8-items are rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 = Very Untrue to 7 = Very True. Sample Items 2. I know how to take notes. 6. I usually do very well in school and at academic tasks.   Reliability, Validity, and Other Research notes In the article describing the development and use of the ASE, the authors observed: “As predicted, academic self-efficacy was significantly and directly related to academic expectations and academic performance.” (Chemers et al., 2001, p. 61)   Sutton et al. (2011) reported Cronbach's alpha of .83 in their study of academic self-esteem and personal strengths. ASE was highly positively correlated with ACT scores (.24) and GPA (.39)....

Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS)

  Assessment name:   Brief Self-Control Scale Scale overview: The Brief Self-Control Scale (BSCS) is a 13-item self-report measure of self-control, which is also called self-discipline and willpower.   Authors: June P. Tangney, Roy F. Baumeister, Angie L. Boone   Response Type: Items are rated on a five-point scale of self-evaluation from 1 = not at all like me to 5 = very much like me. Scale items Example items include “I am good at resisting temptation” and “I have a hard time breaking bad habits” (reverse coded). Psychometric properties In their original publication, Tangney and others (2004) documented high internal consistency and retest values. High scores representing self-control were associated with academic success and better relationships whereas low scores were correlated with personal problems and problem relationships. Availability: The BSCS is widely used and available in many languages. The original 36-item scale and the Brief...

Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ)

  Scale name: Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ) Scale overview: The Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ) is a 29-item self-report measure of both mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics anxiety. Author: Diana Kathleen May Response Type: Items are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale following a “no response” option: 1 = Never 2 = Seldom 3 = Sometimes 4 = Often 5 = usually Sample items 1. I feel confident enough to ask questions  in my mathematics class. 6. I worry that I will not be able to get a  good grade in my mathematics course.   Subscales and basic statistics for the MSEAQ       Self-Efficacy M = 44.11, SD = 10.78, alpha = .93       Anxiety M = 46.47, SD = 12.61, alpha = .93       Total Scale M = 90.58, SD = 22.78, alpha = .96 Reliability: See the Cronbach’s alpha levels reported above. Validity: There were significant ...