Skip to main content

Christian-Based Grief Recovery Scale (CGRS)




 Six Dimensions of Recovery

Assessment name: Christian-Based Grief Recovery Scale (CGRS)

Scale overview: The Christian-Based Grief Recovery Scale (CGRS) is a measure of Christian spirituality focused on recovery from grief. The measures includes 35-items to assess six factors.

Authors: Peter Jen Der Pan et al., 2014

Response Type: Four point rating scale

Scale items: The items are organized into six factors or subscales. The subscales and sample items are below.

1. Spiritual well-being

  With God by my side, I will feel safe and peaceful.

2.  Recovering meaning and sense of control

  After experiencing the sorrow, I have realized what the most important things in life are.

3.  Ongoing physical and emotional responses

I think it’s unfair that my loved one has passed away while I still have to struggle to survive.

4. Reassuring faith

Even though my loved one is no longer alive, I believe that God is always around me and helps me.

5. Strongly missing a deceased loved one

I still miss very much my loved one who has passed away.

6. Life disturbance

I still have unconscious chills when I think of the incident.

 

Psychometric properties

The authors reported alpha = .94 for the total score. The subscale alphas range from .74 to .88.

The six factors accounted for 63.27% of the variance.

The CGRS was positively associated with another measure — Inventory of Grief.

Availability: The items can be found in Table 1 of the Pan et al. (2014) article.

Author contact listed on the article: jender@cycu.edu.tw


Read more about the Psychology of Grief 


Reference for the scale

Jen Der Pan, P., Deng, L.-Y. F., Tsai, S. L., Chen, H.-Y. J., & Yuan, S.-S. J. (2014). Christian-based Grief Recovery Scale (CGRS) [Database record]. APA PsycTests.

https://doi.org/10.1037/t44762-000

 

Sutton, G. W. (2024, April 23). Christian-based Grief Recovery Scale summary. Assessment, Statistics, and Research. Retrieved from

 

Reference for hundreds of measures of spirituality

Assessing Spirituality & Religiosity


ON AMAZON


Reference for using scales in research:

Buy Creating Surveys on

GOOGLE BOOKS

 

AMAZON

 

 

 Reference for clinicians on understanding assessment

Buy Applied Statistics for Counselors

 

GOOGLE BOOKS

 

AMAZON

 


 

 

 




Resource Link:  A – Z Test Index

 

 

 

NOTICE:

The information about scales and measures is provided for clinicians and researchers based on professional publications. The links to authors, materials, and references can change. You may be able to locate details by contacting the main author of the original article or another author on the article list.

 

Post Author

 

Geoffrey W. Sutton PhD is Emeritus Professor of Psychology who publishes book and articles about clinical and social psychology including the psychology of religion. Website:     www.suttong.com

  

Books available on   AMAZON       and the   GOOGLE STORE

 

Connections

   FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton  

  

   X  @Geoff.W.Sutton

 

   PINTEREST  www.pinterest.com/GeoffWSutton

 

FREE: Read many published articles and book samples on:

 

  Academia   Geoff W Sutton   

 

  ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Personal Self-Concept Questionnaire (PSQ)

  The Personal Self-Concept Questionnaire  ( PSQ )   Overview The Personal Self-Concept Questionnaire (PSQ) measures self-concept based on ratings of 18 items, which are grouped into four categories: Self-fulfilment, autonomy, honesty, and emotional self-concept. Subscales : The PSQ has four subscales 1. Self-fulfilment (6 items) 2. Autonomy (4 items) 3. Honesty (3 items) 4. Emotional self-concept (5 items)  ðŸ‘‰ [ Read more about Self-Concept and Self-Identity] The PSQ is a Likert-type scale with five response options ranging from totally disagree to totally agree. Reliability and Validity In the first study, coefficient alpha = .85 and in study two, alpha = .83. Data analysis supported a four-dimensional model (see the four categories above). Positive correlations with other self-concept measures were statistically significant. Other notes The authors estimated it took about 10 minutes to complete the PSQ. Their first study included people ages 12 to 36 ( n = 506). In the second s

Student Self-Efficacy

  Assessment name:  STUDENT SELF-EFFICACY SCALE * Note. This post has been updated to provide an available measure of student self-efficacy. ———- Scale overview:  The  student self-efficacy scale i s a 10-item measure of self-efficacy. It was developed using data from university nursing students in the United States. Authors: Melodie Rowbotham and Gerdamarie Schmitz Response Type:  A four-choice rating scale as follows: 1 = not at all true 2 = hardly true 3 = moderately true 4 = exactly true   Self-efficacy is the perception that a person can act in a way to achieve a desired goal.  Scale items There are 10 items. Examples: I am confident in my ability to learn, even if I am having a bad day. If I try hard enough, I can obtain the academic goals I desire.   Psychometric properties The authors reported that their sample scores ranged from 25 to 40 with a scale mean of 34.23 ( SD  = 3.80. Internal consistency was high at alpha = .84. The authors reported the results of a principal compon

Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ)

  Scale name: Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ) Scale overview: The Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ) is a 29-item self-report measure of both mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics anxiety. Author: Diana Kathleen May Response Type: Items are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale following a “no response” option: 1 = Never 2 = Seldom 3 = Sometimes 4 = Often 5 = usually Sample items 1. I feel confident enough to ask questions  in my mathematics class. 6. I worry that I will not be able to get a  good grade in my mathematics course.   Subscales and basic statistics for the MSEAQ       Self-Efficacy M = 44.11, SD = 10.78, alpha = .93       Anxiety M = 46.47, SD = 12.61, alpha = .93       Total Scale M = 90.58, SD = 22.78, alpha = .96 Reliability: See the Cronbach’s alpha levels reported above. Validity: There were significant positive correlations with similar measures. The results of a Fa