Assessment
name: Desire to Reconcile
Scale
Scale
overview:
The Desire to Reconcile Scale is a 4-item rating scale
developed by Woodyatt and Wenzel (2014) to assess the willingness of an
offender to reconcile with the person they offended.
Authors: Lydia Woodyatt and Michael Wenzel
Response
Type: Items are
rated on a scale of agreement from 0 = Do not Agree at all, 3 = Neutral, and 6
= Strongly Agree.
Scale
items
The scale
includes four items.
Psychometric
properties
The authors’
findings revealed adequate internal consistency (alpha = 0.82) and they
provided support for validity in the form of correlations with self-forgiveness
and self-trust. Griffin (2016) reported a positive correlation between Decisional
Affirmation of Values scale and the Desire to Reconcile Scale.
Availability:
The four
items are included in Woodyatt and Wenzel (2014).
Reference
for the scale
Woodyatt, L., & Wenzel, M. (2014). A needs-based
perspective on self-forgiveness: Addressing threat to moral identity as a means
of encouraging interpersonal and intrapersonal restoration. Journal of
Experimental and Social Psychology, 50, 125-135.
Reference
for using scales in research:
Buy Creating Surveys on
Reference
for clinicians on understanding assessment
Buy Applied Statistics for Counselors
Resource Link: A – Z Test Index
NOTICE:
The
information about scales and measures is provided for clinicians and
researchers based on professional publications. The links to authors,
materials, and references can change. You may be able to locate details by
contacting the main author of the original article or another author on the
article list.
Post Author
Geoffrey W. Sutton PhD is
Emeritus Professor of Psychology who publishes book and articles about clinical
and social psychology including the psychology of religion. Website: www.suttong.com
Books available on AMAZON and the GOOGLE STORE
Connections
FACEBOOK Geoff
W. Sutton
TWITTER @Geoff.W.Sutton
PINTEREST www.pinterest.com/GeoffWSutton
Read many published articles
and book samples on:
Academia Geoff
W Sutton
ResearchGate Geoffrey W Sutton
No comments:
Post a Comment