Skip to main content

Measuring Pentecostal & Charismatic Spirituality




One area of the Psychology of Religion that has been understudied is Pentecostal and Charismatic spirituality. As you might suspect, researchers will define these terms in various ways and, indeed, there are varied beliefs and practices around the world amongst people who identify as Pentecostal or Charismatic.

If outsiders know anything about these "people of the Spirit," they may think of people who speak in tongues, which has become a well-known phenomenon that has made its way into novels and movies.

An additional phenomenon is divine healing. Belief in miracles has marked the Christian faith since its inception. And many Christians believe in prayer for healing. Nevertheless, there has been an emphasis amongst Pentecostals and Charismatics to believe not only that God heals but also that some people are blessed with a gift of healing. The practice usually involves anointing with olive oil followed by prayer for the sick.

In this post, I report on three subscales that my colleagues and I have found useful in survey projects aimed at understanding the relationship of Pentecostal and Charismatic spirituality to other factors. I will report the items with their subscales and our internal consistency values (Chronbach's alpha). I will also report the references to our publications so they can be cited appropriately.

The original publication of the scales is in Sutton, Jordan, and Worthington (2014). In that article you will find our analyses of scale structure, correlations with other variables, and prediction of two factors considered germane to Christianity -- love represented by measures of compassion and forgiveness. A second publication examined only only the Service and Healing subscales in a study of Christian counselors (Sutton, Arnzen, and Kelly, 2016).

Readers have permission to use these scales and items in research and teaching by simply citing the references below.

Christian Service Subscale = 3 items
     Alpha = .99 and .82 (Sutton, Jordan, Worthington 2014)
     Alpha = 78 (Sutton, Arnzen, Kelly, 2016)


1. I am an effective witness for my faith.
Strongly Disagree 1          2          3          4          5          Strongly Agree

2. I am an effective teacher in a church or small group.
Strongly Disagree 1          2          3          4          5          Strongly Agree

3. I am an effective leader or administrator in a church or small group.
Strongly Disagree 1          2          3          4          5          Strongly Agree



Spiritual Gifting Subscale = 4 items
     Alpha = .79 (Sutton, Jordan, Worthington 2014)


1. I speak in tongues.
Strongly Disagree      1          2          3          4          5          Strongly Agree

2. I interpret tongues spoken by others.
Strongly Disagree      1          2          3          4          5          Strongly Agree

3. I have known things about others that only God could have known.
Strongly Disagree      1          2          3          4          5          Strongly Agree

4. I have spoken a prophesy.
Strongly Disagree      1          2          3          4          5          Strongly Agree


Healing subscale = 5 items
     Alpha = .79; (Sutton, Jordan, Worthington 2014)
     Alpha = .70 (Sutton, Arnzen, Kelly, 2016)

      1. I have been healed of a physical condition.
Strongly Disagree 1          2          3          4          5          Strongly Agree
2. I have been healed of depression or anxiety.
Strongly Disagree 1          2          3          4          5          Strongly Agree
3. I have been delivered from a sinful habit.
Strongly Disagree 1          2          3          4          5          Strongly Agree
4. I have been led by God to pray for the sick or hurting.
Strongly Disagree 1          2          3          4          5          Strongly Agree
5. I have prayed for the sick and they’ve been healed.
Strongly Disagree 1          2          3          4          5          Strongly Agree
Learn more about the assessment of Pentecostals and Charismatic Christians on AMAZON          GOOGLE   







BUY CREATING SURVEYS ON AMAZON

Creating Surveys helps professionals and students develop their own projects.











    


 Applied Statistics: Concepts for Counselors, Second Edition






On AMAZON



REFERENCES

Sutton, G. W. (2017). Creating surveys: Evaluating programs and reading research. Springfield: Sunflower. AMAZON Paperback ISBN-10: 1522012729  ISBN-13:  9781522012726 website

Sutton, G. W., Arnzen, C., & Kelly, H. (2016). Christian counseling and psychotherapy: Components of clinician spirituality that predict type of Christian intervention. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 35, 204-214. Academia Link    ResearchGate Link

Sutton, G. W., Jordan, K., & Worthington, E.L., Jr. (2014). Spirituality, hope, compassion, and forgiveness: Contributions of Pentecostal spirituality to godly love. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 33, 212-226. Academia Link     ResearchGate  

Connections

My Page    www.suttong.com

My Books   AMAZON     GOOGLE PLAY STORE

FACEBOOK   Geoff W. Sutton

TWITTER  @Geoff.W.Sutton

Publications (many free downloads)
     
  Academia   Geoff W Sutton   (PhD)
     
  ResearchGate   Geoffrey W Sutton   (PhD)





Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Personal Self-Concept Questionnaire (PSQ)

  The Personal Self-Concept Questionnaire  ( PSQ )   Overview The Personal Self-Concept Questionnaire (PSQ) measures self-concept based on ratings of 18 items, which are grouped into four categories: Self-fulfilment, autonomy, honesty, and emotional self-concept. Subscales : The PSQ has four subscales 1. Self-fulfilment (6 items) 2. Autonomy (4 items) 3. Honesty (3 items) 4. Emotional self-concept (5 items)  ðŸ‘‰ [ Read more about Self-Concept and Self-Identity] The PSQ is a Likert-type scale with five response options ranging from totally disagree to totally agree. Reliability and Validity In the first study, coefficient alpha = .85 and in study two, alpha = .83. Data analysis supported a four-dimensional model (see the four categories above). Positive correlations with other self-concept measures were statistically significant. Other notes The authors estimated it took about 10 minutes to complete the PSQ. Their first study included people ages 12 to 36 ( n = 50...
Post a Comment
Read more

Student Self-Efficacy

  Assessment name:  STUDENT SELF-EFFICACY SCALE * Note. This post has been updated to provide an available measure of student self-efficacy. ———- Scale overview:  The  student self-efficacy scale i s a 10-item measure of self-efficacy. It was developed using data from university nursing students in the United States. Authors: Melodie Rowbotham and Gerdamarie Schmitz Response Type:  A four-choice rating scale as follows: 1 = not at all true 2 = hardly true 3 = moderately true 4 = exactly true   Self-efficacy is the perception that a person can act in a way to achieve a desired goal.  Scale items There are 10 items. Examples: I am confident in my ability to learn, even if I am having a bad day. If I try hard enough, I can obtain the academic goals I desire.   Psychometric properties The authors reported that their sample scores ranged from 25 to 40 with a scale mean of 34.23 ( SD  = 3.80. Internal consistency was high at alpha = .84. The a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ)

  Scale name: Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ) Scale overview: The Mathematics Self-Efficacy and Anxiety Questionnaire (MSEAQ) is a 29-item self-report measure of both mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics anxiety. Author: Diana Kathleen May Response Type: Items are rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale following a “no response” option: 1 = Never 2 = Seldom 3 = Sometimes 4 = Often 5 = usually Sample items 1. I feel confident enough to ask questions  in my mathematics class. 6. I worry that I will not be able to get a  good grade in my mathematics course.   Subscales and basic statistics for the MSEAQ       Self-Efficacy M = 44.11, SD = 10.78, alpha = .93       Anxiety M = 46.47, SD = 12.61, alpha = .93       Total Scale M = 90.58, SD = 22.78, alpha = .96 Reliability: See the Cronbach’s alpha levels reported above. Validity: There were significant ...
Post a Comment
Read more